
We have compared GeneMapper with two other reference based annotation programs using a benchmark data set of orthologous human and mouse genes (Projector test set, Myer and Durbin 2004). The human annotations were used as reference to predict genes in mouse. The accuracy of the programs is summarized below (this table, as well as more details and other results appear in our paper). Note that Genewise is more suitable for aligning proteins to genomic sequence, and Projector may be highly accurate in cases where its underlying pairHMM suitably models the evolution of the genes.
| Program | Nucl Sn. | Nucl Sp. | Exon Sn. | Exon Sp. | Gene Sn. | Gene Sp. |
| GeneWise | 99.86 % | 99.91 % | 92.76 % | 93.44 % | 61.32 % | 60.91 % |
| Projector | 99.78 % | 99.70 % | 94.19 % | 90.47 % | 59.88 % | 59.47 % |
| GeneMapper | 99.88 % | 99.94 % | 97.15 % | 97.79 % | 81.69 % | 81.69 % |
S. Chatterji and L. Pachter, Reference based annotation with GeneMapper, Genome Biology 7 (2006), R29.